Blog

As the Summer of Sweat continues, Renewable energy companies are finding their tools to power cities in Texas hard to replenish. Under the current circumstances, renewable energy has come in to save the day, when assisting Texas to avoid the outages that would so plague the state. This would come often, as the record demand would often exceed the supply; something that these renewable energy source companies are constantly trying to build bigger and better versions of. But the main problem here lies in that the gird operator is overseeing a plan, utilizing grid resources to upgrade tech by going offline. Otherwise known as “tripping,” such a process would otherwise, coincidentally, cause a break in the grid, therefore spelling likely disaster. The IEEE or the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers are in turn in accordance with the proposal as it honors already the voluntary recommendations. However, it still is a dicey subject to oppose.

Companies involved are showing active discussion about this. ERCOT, otherwise known as the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, state how there’s no opposition of the intent for standards. What the objection is in specific? There’s no objection to what the timeline shows as it details renewable resources right from the grid as they lift the cost of future installations. The ERCOT proposal itself won’t hurt traditional fossil fuel plants but may hit the renewable energy industry, harder than anyone bargains for. Various developers bleive that beyond 50,000 Mega-Watts of wind and solar power will have to be retired or even disconnected from the grid, all while the tweak in the rule may result in about 5,000 MW getting tripped. ERCOT grids need to be powered above at least 80,000 MW in order to service Texans well on even the hottest of summer days. There’s multiple ramifications that these retirements are going to have on various operations.

The goal continues to be keeping up the rate of reliability as the companies powering renewable energy faces even further demand.

The proposal could be a step in the opposing direction. The proposal itself would drive solar, wind and battery operators to have to upgrade technology and programming to therefore “ride-through” various grid disturbances. Within the timeline, generators have no choice but to comply by the end of 2025, or even disconnect from ERCOT. The ERCOT subcommittee in turn has a response to the concerns from renewable developers, being that they would like to delay the scheduled vote on the proposal, while they’re hoping to come to an agreement by the time October comes around. After which, it would be approved by the state Public Utility Commission.

ERCOT is too aggressive, according to varied renewable energy developers and manufacturers. Many experts in the field don’t even think the technology that is needed can’t even help older generations meet the impossibly high standards that are set by these new rules, all while existing in the time required to fulfill the proposed deadline.

Renewable developers are lobbying to slow down the process. We’ll see how wind and solar generators comply, as they don’t see it possible for inverters to easily convert their power for it’s usage on the grid. Without such resources, it would carry risks in the event of electric fault.